Friday, August 12, 2005

I believed in Intelligent Design ... and then I met you

Okay here it is. This is for Steve, my silent, but apparently loyal reader (whom I had never heard of until today).

Let’s talk about “Intelligent Design!”

A brief synopsis: some people think children should be exposed to all the facts and allowed to take more than one unproven viewpoint into consideration about the earth’s foundation. Not surprisingly, the idea of their party not having a total monopoly on our children’s education greatly upsets those self-proclaimed champions of tolerance, diversity and open-mindedness on the left.

Experts at painting pictures of the right as morons waving their Bibles in the air and demanding the stoning death of girls in short skirts, they have set to work with a vengeance to discredit intelligent design. The current picture: President Bush forces children to recite chapters of Genesis in class while a frustrated parents, bound and gagged, look on.

It would be pointless for me to pretend to be unbiased about this debate, since everyone who reads this blog knows that I believe God created the earth (idiotic I know, when you hold it up next to the alternative – that it burst into existence by magic).

Let’s overlook, for a moment, all the arguments against evolution and assume against all reason that there was nothing, and then, quite suddenly, there was something huge that contained all the exact conditions required to support millions of different life forms all living in relative harmony – what the new-agers would call “the circle of life.”

Let’s pretend “science,” the current vanguard of the liberal agenda to control your child’s mind, has not found numerous large holes in Darwin’s theory (no, I promise you, it IS a theory, no matter HOW loudly you scream over me).

If it’s so OBVIOUSLY right, why don’t you think your children are smart enough to figure that out? Why try to stifle every peep of opposition? Creationist families have been forced to allow their children to sit through classes where theory is taught as fact and opposing ideas are ridiculed for years. And the outcome is that our kids know both sides of the story. Yours don’t even know what they’re ridiculing.

This has been evidenced in my own experience more than once.

My friend Ben and I, on our way to a camping trip, got into a discussion about it once. I told him that there are plenty of scientists who were also creationists – the two are not actually mutually exclusive.

He smiled condescendingly, and, (looking a little embarrassed on my behalf) said, “but … not real scientists.” Silly, stupid Kate he added silently.

On another camping trip (one I wasn’t on) Ben, stepped in his own campfire after eating a few too many mushrooms.

The funny thing is, Intelligent Design is not religion. It’s merely the idea that some evidence suggests there was a plan behind the earth. No one is suggesting we beat our kids about the heads with Bibles until they can chant our religious mantra.

Just that you give them an alternative to the utter nonsense with which you’ve been filling their impressionable young minds.

7 Comments:

At 9:14 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Kate,

Thanks so much. It's good to see that your humor has as sharp an edge as ever. Sorry if I've been silent. I've watched you blog through your military career and your transition into civilian life. I appreciate your perspective on life, politics and culture.

I agree with your position on ID and think it's ridiculous that the other side has had a free reign to present their theories as fact for so long. Maybe that's why many families have left the public schools in favor of private or home schooling.

No matter what you do with your career, I hope you keep writing.

Steve

 
At 11:35 AM, Blogger Matt said...

What irritates me is when "scientists" insist that evolution is a "provable, repeatable and demonstratable phenomenom."

 
At 11:44 AM, Blogger Kate Robinson said...

Right. It doesn't follow. If a creature starts out small and helpless and evolves slowly into a stronger creature to stay alive...reasoning would expect the end result to be something large and armored. Instead, we the dominant life form is a weak, soft creature with no natural way to keep warm or kill food, but with superior intelligence. where did that little twist come from?

For a really great article on this, check out today's Human Events Online. The article is by Christopher Flickinger and is called, "Biology Prof: Evolution Isn't Theory, It's Fact."

 
At 10:53 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

And the spammer strikes yet again...

Anyways... very good post. This is something that I have found to be irritating. Darwinism is a theory (and one that is more based on faith then the belief in Creationism) not something that is based in concrete. As such it can't be taught as doctrine (so to say). Other theories must be shown (such as the correct one: Creationism) or at least mention the other ones if they can't go into detail due to the "religious nature" of it.

But then again the public school system is corrupt.

 
At 2:41 PM, Blogger The Shadow Walker said...

Yo.
Anyways for my bit:

Whenever I come into contact with someone that "believes" in evolution, I promptly agree with them. You see, micro-evolution (minor variations in the genome) are scientifically proven. That a fact that many people in both the Christian and Non-Christian community seem to be ignorant of. However, expanding that to include changes so radical that a rat can now fly...that's a little far fetched.

Anyways, after I have finished with that, I shrug and go on to comment that at least with Creationism, you have a way of know how you really got here. After all, evolution (even if it was possible) couldn't have happened if there were no raw materials to work with. As soon as they explain to me how the raw materials to start the process got into place, I nodded obediently and promptly ask how we evolved the process of co-reproduction (aka...you know...). I mean, evolution is suppose to be some straight shot to mroe complexity, right? So how did it diverge and make up males and females? And how did it do it successfully? That's something they should be forced to answer first before droning on about the dinosaurs being around many millions of years before man was.

 
At 12:01 PM, Blogger Kate Robinson said...

Hi guys! tell me you didn't miss me. I dare you. haha.

 
At 9:23 PM, Blogger Neemund said...

Kate Robinson, we did not miss you or...oh wait, that's a lie; nevermind. Listen to a show like Coast to Coast AM on the radio sometime and there are tons of athiests who believe in ID, they just think it's a result of advanced ETs who wanted to create slaves. Look at Darwin's theories of natural selection and those principles are observable, testable, scientific facts. What you cannot prove is that over thousands of generations a population will change to the point that it cannot reproduce with another population of the same species.

On another note, that stock EGTY is no longer being traded on any major market, and has lost 20% value since being spammed into this post.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home